We Shape our Buildings, Thereafter They Shape Us”: The Architecture of Justice

Within our televisions, and indeed in most cinematic depictions of the Houses of Justice, there are clear architectural indicators of what the physical spaces of Justice should look like. And irrespective of authorship and design, many of the characteristic elements of Court premises are remarkably consistent; grand entrances, monumental staircases, extravagantly high ceilings, elevated judicial benches crafted from solid wood, all deliberate choices intended to elicit a particular psychological and emotional response from the visitor. Through different historical periods, and across most geographical locations, the soaring ceilings of a Court tell a story of grandeur and solemnity, it’s entrance inspires confidence and respect, while the hardwood furnishings and panels speak on permanence and stability. And as such, Justice is built before it is spoken.
Yet, within the Jordanian context, this is not always the reality encountered as much of our Courts tell a rather different story. The grandeur has transitioned into functionality, monumental halls have transformed into bustling corridors, elevated wooden benches are replaced by ground-level veneered office desks and the quiet solemnity of Justice is frequently disturbed by the commotion of administrative staff and visitors alike. 
And the question becomes, has the physical environment in which Justice is administered in the Kingdom influenced public confidence in, and perception of, the Judicial system? 

Authored by Articled Associate Fairouz Abu Dahab